Partners & Investors
Clinical Corvus is building an EHR-independent workflow intelligence layer for acute care teams. The product targets a clear pain point—cognitive overload + fragmented data + slow integration cycles—with a deployment model that can deliver value without waiting for deep interoperability.
Why It Wins
- Time-to-value without integration: the clinical interface (copy/paste + documents) is the adoption wedge.
- Clinician control by design: suggestions are drafts; teams review via check-to-accept.
- Trust posture: privacy-first and audit-friendly outputs (e.g., cited answers when evidence is requested).
- Technology moat (high level): multi-agent orchestration + hybrid retrieval + deterministic clinical state, optimized for stability and auditability.
What We Are (And Aren’t)
- We are a workflow cockpit for rounds, handoff, and evidence-backed decisions.
- We are not an autonomous ordering system.
- We are not positioned as a fully automated diagnostic device; the clinician remains accountable.
Deployment & Enterprise Fit
- Flexible model strategy: support for different inference backends depending on cost, latency, and governance.
- Privacy posture: local-first defaults and strict controls around external retrieval.
- Institutional adoption: can start as a team tool and expand based on measurable workflow impact.
Pilot: What To Prove
A good pilot should answer a few practical questions:
- Workflow impact: do clinicians build a mental model and draft a plan faster, with less rework?
- Handoff reliability: are I-PASS drafts consistent, editable, and less prone to omissions?
- Evidence utility: when the team asks for evidence, are sources relevant and easy to review?
- Trust & control: do clinicians review drafts and make edits (rather than blindly accepting them)?
- Operational fit: does it fit privacy, governance, and documentation constraints in the target setting?